Content and editorial transparency
How to understand authorship, sources, editorial review and corrections on PsyToday.
Updated：2026-10-17
What our articles offer
Our articles offer general information and prompts for reflection. They do not establish a diagnosis, prescribe treatment, or replace a consultation with a qualified professional.
Sources and authorship
An editorial byline identifies the publishing account. It does not establish that a clinician wrote or reviewed an article. Research claims should be read with the linked sources and their limitations. Illustrative images are not evidence of a real case or treatment outcome.
Sources and professional review
A professional review is only established when a named reviewer, relevant background and review date are explicitly shown. Where references are missing, do not treat the page as a research review or a clinical guideline. Reference links, where present, are provided for checking the stated information.
Counselor profiles and sponsorship
Counselor profiles are directory information. A listing, position in a list or display of contact details is not a guarantee of credentials or service outcomes. Check qualifications, fees, confidentiality and cancellation terms directly. Sponsorship is separate from professional endorsement.
Corrections
For a factual error, authorship issue or rights concern, contact the site at dage21un1@qq.com. Include the page URL and supporting material. Publication and update dates should reflect actual publication and substantive changes.